22 Dec The lowdown
A libertarian dream country?
American business is by and large staying out of Myanmar for various reasons, usually citing political uncertainties prior to the 2015 elections, the continuing sanctions regime that imposes restrictions on who they can work with locally, or the reticence of American banks to deal with Myanmar counter-parties.
22 Dec Build it and they will come
|The parliament complex in Nay Pyi Taw. Photo: Hong Sar|
When US President Barack Obama galloped through Naypyitaw last month it was the consummation of a dream many years in the making. Myanmar’s old military rulers have long sought legitimacy and international rehabilitation.
17 Dec The power of the R-word
Brian Pellot, the director of global strategy at the Religion News Service, published his take on the use of the word “Rohingya” in the Washington Post on December 4. For once he didn’t focus on the tensions between the Myanmar government and the UN, but on the unsavoury role of National League for Democracy leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in the public debate over the situation in Rakhine State.
The recent talk that Myanmar’s reforms are lurching towards failure misses the point. After so many decades of military dictatorship we need a reality check about the comparisons that Myanmar deserves, especially at this delicate moment in an historic process of political change.
No more contentious issue than the Israeli-Palestinian confrontation has occurred in the American media. On November 23, 2014, The New York Times public editor devoted a full page (“The Conflict and the Coverage”) to discussion of whether that problem was treated with appropriate objectivity, balance, and clarity in that newspaper. There had been many complaints on all sides of those issues. This was an unprecedented and important public discussion of the problems in reporting stories, inclusion of photographs and assignment of reporters and staff.